How do presidential appointments work?
The Civic Listening Corps was formed in January 2022 to give communities across the country the tools and training needed to identify and fight the misinformation we see online every day. Our goal is to use the knowledge we gather together to prevent further attempts to undermine our civic discourse.
By subscribing to our reports, sharing this post, or directing your friends and family to civiclistening.org, YOU can make a difference against the spread of online misinformation.
What are presidential appointments?
Presidential appointments allow the president to staff critical positions with individuals aligned with their policy priorities. Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the U.S. The Constitution, known as the Appointments Clause, grants the president the authority to nominate candidates for key roles, such as ambassadors and Supreme Court justices, subject to Senate confirmation. For lower-level positions, called "inferior officers," Congress can delegate appointment authority to the president, department heads, or courts. This framework reflects the Founders’ intent to balance efficiency in staffing with checks and balances that uphold accountability.
Federal appointments are divided into several categories, each serving a unique purpose within the government. Approximately 1,200 Presidential Appointment with Senate confirmation (PAS) positions, including Cabinet secretaries and agency heads, require Senate approval. Noncareer Senior Executive Service (NC-SES) positions are high-level roles bridging senior leadership with broader government operations, and about 750 of these positions exist. Presidential Appointment (PA) positions, such as senior White House advisors, do not require Senate confirmation and provide direct support to the president. Additionally, Schedule C positions, totaling around 1,550, focus on confidential or policy-driven roles, typically at the GS-15 level or below.
What about Cabinet members?
The president's Cabinet forms a crucial subset of PAS appointments, made up of individuals appointed to lead the executive departments and advise the president on key national issues. Cabinet members oversee foreign relations, defense, agriculture, business, labor, and environmental protection. While the president selects these leaders, their appointments require Senate confirmation to maintain checks and balances. Once in office, Cabinet members implement laws, manage their departments, and report regularly to the president, who retains final decision-making authority. Delegating responsibilities to the Cabinet allows the president to manage the complex and wide-ranging demands of governance effectively
What is the appointment process?
The appointment process involves three stages to maintain a balance of power and ensure transparency. First, the president nominates a candidate for the position, exercising sole discretion in this choice. Second, the Senate evaluates the nominee, providing either advice and consent through approval or rejecting the nomination. Finally, upon Senate confirmation, the president officially appoints and commissions the individual to their role.
Can appointees be removed from their positions?
The president’s authority to remove appointees is also a critical aspect of maintaining accountability within the executive branch. In Myers v. United States (1926), the Supreme Court affirmed the president’s broad power to remove executive officers, emphasizing the necessity of such authority for effective law enforcement. However, in Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (1935), the Court limited this power, holding that Congress could impose "for cause" removal protections for members of independent regulatory agencies. Later, in Morrison v. Olson (1988), the Court clarified that Congress may set reasonable removal restrictions so long as they do not unduly interfere with the president’s constitutional duties.
What about independent agencies?
Independent agencies, such as the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), operate with a degree of autonomy not found in traditional executive agencies. Congress has instituted safeguards for these agencies, including fixed terms for leadership, bipartisan membership requirements, and "for cause" removal protections. These measures ensure the agencies can function without direct presidential control while remaining focused on their specific statutory mandates. Despite these limitations, the president can still influence these agencies through appointments or by leveraging political capital. Courts also play a critical role by ensuring agency actions comply with statutory requirements and remain free from improper political interference. This balance allows independent agencies to fulfill their duties while reflecting the broader policy goals of the executive branch.
Despite the presidential influence on agencies, this does not equate to a complete overhaul of government and agency functions. When a president appoints new leadership to federal agencies, there are both changes and elements that remain consistent. Newly appointed officials often bring shifts in policy priorities and strategies that align with the president’s agenda. For instance, leadership changes may result in new approaches to regulation, enforcement, or the execution of laws. However, much of the agency’s foundational structure, statutory responsibilities, and career civil service workforce remain unchanged. This continuity ensures that while agencies adapt to new leadership, their core missions and legal mandates persist, providing stability and accountability within the federal government.